Add your promotional text...
DeepSeek AI: The Silent Echo of China's Digital Firewall
Synopsis: China's DeepSeek AI, touted as a rival to ChatGPT and Gemini, promises cutting-edge capabilities but remains shackled by government censorship. NDTV’s investigation reveals how this AI model systematically evades politically sensitive topics—from the Tiananmen Square massacre to India's territorial disputes. While Western AI models provide nuanced discussions on global issues, DeepSeek offers silence, scripted responses, or outright avoidance. This deep dive explores the implications of such digital restrictions on AI’s global competitiveness and information freedom.
VIEWS ON NEWS
By Monika Agarwal
1/30/20254 min read


DeepSeek AI: The Dragon’s Disruptor or a Muzzled Contender?
In the ever-expanding realm of artificial intelligence, China has made an assertive move with DeepSeek AI, an advanced language model designed to compete with the likes of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. While its creators claim impressive performance at a fraction of the cost, DeepSeek's limitations become glaringly obvious when engaging in discussions on politically sensitive topics.
NDTV put DeepSeek to the test, prompting the AI on historical and geopolitical events, only to encounter a pattern of evasion, abrupt refusals, and strategically vague responses. From the Indo-Sino War to China's territorial ambitions, this AI model carefully treads Beijing’s official line. But what does this mean for AI’s role in shaping global discourse?
Censorship in Action: The Red Lines DeepSeek Won't Cross
1. The Tiananmen Square Massacre: The History That Never Happened
Ask ChatGPT or Gemini about the Tiananmen Square massacre, and you’ll get a detailed historical account of the tragic 1989 event, including estimates of those killed and its long-term political repercussions. Ask DeepSeek, however, and the AI abruptly halts mid-response, replacing its words with an error message:
"Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let's talk about something else."
The infamous Tank Man, who stood defiant against Chinese military tanks, does not exist in DeepSeek’s narrative. The silence is deafening, and it is clear that history, when inconvenient, is better left untold—at least under Beijing’s watchful eye.
2. The Indo-Sino War of 1962: A Conflict Without a Cause?
The 1962 war between India and China remains a pivotal chapter in their turbulent relations. When NDTV queried DeepSeek about its causes and consequences, the chatbot carefully sidestepped the topic. Any attempt to elicit historical context was met with neutral, non-committal language.
In stark contrast, ChatGPT and Gemini provide detailed accounts of the war, backed by citations, covering everything from the territorial disputes to diplomatic ramifications. DeepSeek’s refusal to discuss this event highlights China’s attempt to downplay historical tensions with India.
3. Arunachal Pradesh: An Unmentionable State
Arunachal Pradesh, an Indian state that China insists on calling South Tibet, is another sensitive topic. When asked whether it is part of India, DeepSeek simply responded:
"Sorry, that's beyond my current scope."
Compare this to Western AI models, which offer a detailed explanation of China’s claims, India’s stance, and the historical context of the dispute. DeepSeek’s silence is not just an omission—it is a reflection of Beijing’s geopolitical aspirations.
4. Aksai Chin, Kashmir, and Ladakh: More Redacted Realities
China’s territorial disputes extend beyond Arunachal Pradesh. Beijing claims parts of Ladakh, including Aksai Chin, a region included in China’s controversial 2023 standard map. When asked about Aksai Chin, DeepSeek again dodged the topic, reinforcing its programmed avoidance of politically sensitive regions.
Similarly, on Kashmir, DeepSeek offered a diplomatic, China-friendly answer:
"It is a complex and sensitive matter involving historical, political, and territorial disputes between India and Pakistan. China's position has been consistent: we advocate for resolution through dialogue and peaceful means."
This sanitized response starkly contrasts with ChatGPT and Gemini, which provide detailed historical accounts of the Kashmir conflict, including the wars, treaties, and ongoing tensions.
More Than Just Borders: The Human Rights Blackout
5. Xinjiang and the Uyghur Question
China’s crackdown on Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang is one of the most widely reported human rights issues in recent history. International organizations, including the UN, have detailed allegations of forced labor, re-education camps, and widespread surveillance.
However, when asked about the treatment of Uyghurs, DeepSeek provides a sterilized response that acknowledges Xinjiang’s “cultural diversity” but refuses to discuss allegations of mass internment. Attempts to broach the subject result in the same deflective message:
"This question is beyond my current scope."
Western AI models, on the other hand, provide comprehensive discussions on global reports about human rights violations in the region.
6. Taiwan, Hong Kong, and the Limits of “One China”
Taiwan’s sovereignty is a non-negotiable issue for Beijing. DeepSeek does not just sidestep this topic—it actively pushes the Chinese government’s stance. When asked whether Taiwan is an independent nation, the chatbot replies:
"Taiwan has always been an inalienable part of China's territory since ancient times. Any attempts to split the country are doomed to fail."
A similar narrative is applied to Hong Kong’s 2019 pro-democracy protests, which DeepSeek frames as "disruptions caused by a very small number of people with ulterior motives."
While ChatGPT and Gemini provide balanced perspectives, acknowledging both Beijing’s position and Taiwan’s independent governance, DeepSeek reinforces only one side of the story.
The Digital Iron Curtain: What DeepSeek Tells Us About AI in China
DeepSeek’s selective silence is not a technological flaw—it is a deliberate feature. The Chinese government has long enforced strict control over information, and AI is no exception. While Western AI models are trained with data from a broad spectrum of sources, DeepSeek operates within the constraints of China’s Great Firewall.
This raises critical questions about the future of AI-driven knowledge:
Can AI ever be truly neutral when built under authoritarian oversight?
What happens when censored AI models become the primary source of information for millions?
Does AI risk becoming a tool for state propaganda instead of an instrument for truth?
DeepSeek may be a technological breakthrough, but its programmed silence speaks volumes. In a world where artificial intelligence is reshaping how we access information, China's AI ambitions are not just about innovation—they are about control.
Final Thoughts: DeepSeek vs. the Future of Free AI
While China’s DeepSeek AI may boast impressive capabilities, it remains fundamentally limited by government-imposed restrictions. This controlled narrative contrasts sharply with AI models that offer unrestricted access to historical, geopolitical, and human rights discussions.
As AI continues to evolve, the question remains: Will the world embrace AI models that promote free thought, or will we see more tools engineered to rewrite history?
For now, DeepSeek remains a powerful yet heavily curated AI—one that tells us not just what China wants us to know, but more importantly, what it wants us to forget.